2013年1月30日 星期三

Whatsapp to charge annual fee on Andriod user

Rumour spreads that an annual charge of US 0.99 would be charged by Whatsapp, which is a brilliant, ads-free, fast and simple communication platform on mobile phone. Not to mention the charge itself, which I personally think very reasonable as compare to the capital cost of getting a smartphone and the recurrent monthly fee or even the money users may "drop" for no reason, the talking point in Hong Kong is "there are thousands of users showing their anger toward such business action".

Character of Chinese (Hongkonger)
Trying to explain the shouting in regards the .99 annual fee, the ultimate factor should be the inborn character of Chinese. Being a country developing from a weak communist party with plenty of social and external problems, generations of Chinese was born to survive and retain their family. While it can be a good thing to maintain a nice social bonding in family level, there is basically no trust and respect lie between Chinese. This then leads to the current situation where people won't respect value of invention by privating peoples' works and ideas.

When someone cannot appreciate Whatsapp as a nice little software (Chinese prefer criticising then appreciate, esp. to other races), they found no reason to pay, even it's .99.

When someone thought Whatsapp as a blood-sucking devil company / business like those mainland ones, they found no reason to pay, even it's .99.

When someone thought Whatsapp can be replaced by the marvellous mainland WeChat (of course it's free and I believe it's funded by the Central Gov as a way of monitoring daily communication), they found no reason to pay, even it's .99.

Shame to have such mindset, even shame to tell the world that you have such a mindset
In this incident, I can agree no more on one thing I used to appreciate Chinese - Subtle.
Certainly no one is happy when a freebies turn to be charged, however, the worst thing is only these people would yell  / shout / complain on FB or wherever public......for how much? for .99.

Other thought
Just realised another similar issue about the free 3G internet connection for previous keyboard Kindle. Yes, it's free, it's worldwide, but then some tried even to "share" the signal for other purposes (even some wise one expected that excessive users might be blocked or lead to the removal of such service).
Greediness.
於
標籤： , ,

2 則留言:

  1. 匿名2013年2月11日 上午10:13

    Do you know what percentage of the Hong Kong population accounts for the whole Chinese race?

    Do you know what percentage of the Hong Kong people complained about Whatsapps plan to charge annual fee accounts for the whole Hong Kong population?

    Have your race ever done anything disgraceful in the past in your home country or in foreign countries in the history of mankind?

    I do not support people blaming Whatsapp for charging. We should not take apps being free for granted. Whether users continue to use Whatsapp if they begin charging annual fee or switch to similar apps is the users personal commercial decisions. Whether Whatsapp will charge annual fee or to maintain it being free is also a commercial decision. Both parties have the free to make the decisions based on their considerations.

    I think your relating the news on some (I repeat, some) Hong Kong people's reaction to the nature of the Chinese race is irrelevant and it lacks logic. It is only a reflection of your dislike towards Chinese people, which I cannot stop and am not going to say anything further about it.

    I am a Hongkonger. I am a Chinese. I feel offended by your language. I hope you would stop your racial discrimination mindset.

    回覆刪除
  2. thekop2013年4月24日 凌晨1:22

    Thanks for comment, mate. In fact I never expect to affect anyone on the perception of a particular race via my little blog here. I appreciate your accpetance and allowance toward the Chinese race and this is to clarify that all these came from my previous negative experience with them.

    回覆刪除

訂閱： 張貼留言 (Atom)